Dispossession does not moot an appeal

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

Fact that tenant was no longer in possession of premises did not render tenant’s appeal of eviction moot.  Trial court erred failing to construe Tenant’s answer and motion as a motion to determine rent and in granting judgment of possession and costs without conducting a rent determination hearing.

Tenant notified the landlord of a rodent infestation.  When the landlord failed to act, tenant spent $50.00  on rodent treatment and deducted the amount from his February rent, paying $450.00  out of the $500 rent due.  The landlord accepted the payment and notified the tenant he was short $50.00.    Then on February 5th, the landlord filed an eviction for holdover alleging he had served the tenant a notice of non-renewal on January 13, effective January 31, despite having accepted a February rent payment.

On February 11,  the tenant filed an “Answer/Request Hearing”  requesting  that the court deny the eviction and argued that “the management company should not be able to hold my security deposit funds, and rent funds in contempt with the court system.” The Tenant  deposited $500 for his March rent in the court registry. On March 19,  the trial court entered an Order Striking Answer and Entry of Default, and judgment for possession and $225 costs, which was “[b]ased upon Defendant’s failure to pay necessary monies into the Court Registry or to file an appropriate motion to determine the amount of rent to be paid into the Court Registry . . . .” The tenant appealed.

The landlord argued the appeal should be dismissed as moot because the tenant had, by then, been evicted. The appellate court ruled that ‘[m]ootness does not destroy an appellate court’s jurisdiction . . . if ‘collateral legal consequences that affect the rights of a party flow from the issue to be determined.’ ” Id. (quoting Godwin, 193 So. 2d at 212) (alteration added). A recent opinion from another Eleventh Judicial Circuit appellate panel determined that “ceasing to reside in [an] apartment does not moot an appeal from an eviction judgment,” since an eviction judgment “may cause collateral consequences such as a negative credit history.” Daniels v. Miami Beverly, Case No. 14-283 AP (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. Aug. 25, 2017) [25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 587c].   In Schweickert, the Fifth DCA found that a case was not rendered moot when a request for attorney’s fees remained pending. Schweickert, 193 So. 3d at 1079. Likewise, the instant case is not moot while the Appellant remains liable for the $225 cost award.

The appellate court noted that §83.60 Florida Statutes “Defenses to action for rent or possession”  provides the tenant has three options to avoid a default: “[a] tenant may: (1) assert payment as a defense; (2) deposit the accrued rent as alleged in the Complaint; or (3) file a motion to determine the amount of rent.” Green v. Liberty City Cmty. Economic Dev. Corp., 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 122a (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. Nov. 21, 2013).

In the instant case,  the tenant timely filed a pro se “Answer/Request Hearing” asserting that he paid $450 out of $500 for his February rent and that he deducted $50 to cover the rodent control costs. Although the document was not a formal motion to determine the amount of rent, a portion of its title is labeled “Request Hearing,” it states in part that “This letter is to request trial,” it states that “I look forward to the fair trial and hearings to determine this situation,” it argues that the Appellant “should not be financially obligated for this eviction.”

The appellate court noted that it would review requests by tenants liberally as motions to determine rent, including requests included in an answer instead of being filed as a separate pleading. See Daniels v Miami Beverly, Case No. 14-283 AP (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. Aug. 25, 2017) [25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 587c]; Harvey v. Campton Assoc., 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 48a (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. Apr. 15, 2013). In the instant case, like in the Daniels case, the tenant  placed his request in writing, stated the reasons why he challenged the rent amount, and indicated that he wanted a hearing. In Daniels, the court found that such a request was sufficient for an unrepresented tenant to satisfy the condition that the tenant may file a motion to determine rent in order to avoid a default. Likewise, the tenant in the instant case, who was unrepresented at the time that he filed his “Answer/Request Hearing,” adequately moved to determine rent, so that default should not have been entered against him.   Thus the appellate court reversed the trial courts order striking tenant’s answer granting the eviction and judgment for costs, and further awarded tenant costs and fees for the appeal.  The case was remanded to the trial court to conduct a rent determination hearing.

MICHAEL AARON CALLAHAN, Appellant, v. DAVID OM, LLC, Appellee. Circuit Court, 11th Judicial Circuit (Appellate) in and for Miami-Dade County. Case No. 16-127 AP. L.T. Case No. 16-2360 CC 05. December 11, 2017. On Appeal from the County Court in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2511CALL

Advertisements

The grass is always greener on the other side.

Tags

, , , , ,

Security deposit — Claim on security deposit denied where landlord failed to present evidence that the property was undamaged at the beginning of the tenancy or prove that tenants breached their duty to maintain.

On April 6, 2016, tenants sued for the return of their $2200.00 security deposit.  Landlord filed a counterclaim for the cost of resodding the lawn,  alleging tenants failed to maintain it.

Paragraph 13 of the lease provided that tenants shall maintain the lawn, but if  landlord is not satisfied with tenants maintenance, landlord may maintain the lawn his self at tenants’ expense.

Paragraph 25 of the lease provided that Tenant shall  surrender the premises in as good condition as at the start of this lease.”

The earliest photograph of the law was taken seven months after the lease began and showed extensive brown spots.  There was further evidence  that the landlord and dug up the lawn to replace the sewer line,  of salt water intrusion, and of  failures of the sprinkler system. The court found that tenants did not breach their duty to maintain the lawn and that landlord had not proven that the lawn was in worse condition at the end of the tenancy than at the beginning.

The court ordered the return of $2100 of the security deposit and denied the landlord’s counterclaim in its entirety.    Landlord appealed.

The Appellate Court noted that the standard of review of the trial court’s finding of facts were that will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous.” State Tr. Realty, LLC v. Deutsche Bank Nat. Tr. Co. Ams., 207 So. 3d 923, 925 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) [41 Fla. L. Weekly D2328a]; Tampa HCP, LLC v. Bachor, 72 So. 3d 323, 326 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) [36 Fla. L. Weekly D2350b]; Universal Beverages Holdings, Inc. v. Merkin, 902 So. 2d 288, 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) [30 Fla. L. Weekly D1338b]; see Thorpe v. Myers, 67 So. 3d 338, 341 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) [36 Fla. L. Weekly D1524b] (deferring to the circuit court’s findings of fact when they are based on competent, substantial evidence).

As the trial court’s finding appeared to be based in part on landlord’s  failure to present evidence that the lawn was in a healthier condition when the  tenants moved in and in part because the lawn was generally difficult to maintain due to flooding and damaged by landlord  during the sewer pipe trenching. It was within the trial court’s purview to reach this finding after weighing the testimony and evidence adduced at trial.

Thus, Appellate Court found that the Final Judgment was not clearly erroneous and affirmed.

LAMPROS HAROCOPOS, Appellant, v. ROBERT STEVEN EAST and TARA DAVIS EAST, Appellees. Circuit Court, 6th Judicial Circuit (Appellate) in and for Pinellas County. Case No. 16-000045AP-88A. UCN: 522016AP000045XXXXCI. December 7, 2017. Appeal from Final Judgment Pinellas County Court

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2511HARO

2018 Florida Legislative Session – pending Landlord -Tenant Bills

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

SB 612, HB 479 Leases.  Authorizing landlords to perform a level 1 background check on its employees with access to leased premises.  Giving tenants a 3 day right of recession on lease/lease renewal and return of deposits upon failure of employee  screening.

SB 804, CS/HB 631 providing for summary procedure for possession on an ejectment in Circuit Court.

CS/SB 1400, SB 1640: Vacation Rentals:  preempting local regulation of vacation rentals to the State. Requiring licenses,  declaring them to be transient occupancies.

HB 1007, Evictions. Deletes requirement that tenant post rent in court registry within five days.  Requires court to try the case in 30 days.  Deletes requirement that tenant have previously served landlord with 7 day notice to repair before being able to raise repairs as a defense.

 The session is now over and none of the bills passed

TRACKED BILLS

CS/SB 612 (2018) Residential Tenancies

http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2018/00612

SENATE – Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration

SB 850 (2018) Actions for Rent or Possession

http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2018/00850

SENATE – Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration

CS/CS/SB’s 1400 & 1640 (2018) Vacation Rentals

http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2018/01400

SENATE – Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration

HB 301 (2018) Housing Assistance

http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2018/00301

HOUSE – Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration

HB 749 (2018) Residential Tenancies

http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2018/00749

HOUSE – Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration

HB 1007 (2018) Actions for Rent or Possession

http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2018/01007

HOUSE – Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration

SB 850 (2018) Actions for Rent or Possession

http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2018/00850

SENATE – Died in Judiciary

CS/CS/SB’s 1400 & 1640 (2018) Vacation Rentals

http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2018/01400

SENATE – Died in Appropriations

CS/SB 612 (2018) Residential Tenancies

http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2018/00612

SENATE – Died in Judiciary

FLORIDA DISASTER ASSISTANCE MANUAL For Legal Services Advocates

Tags

, , , , , ,

Below find the residential landlord tenant portion of the 2014 Florida Disaster Assistance Manual for Legal Services Advocates.    This is a summary of residential landlord tenant law as may be applicable in the event of a disaster.  Florida’s toll-free Disaster Legal Services Hotline Number is 866-550-2929.

FEMAManual2014

The entire manual can be viewed here

 

What to do when the leased premises has hurricane damage

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Where the use of the leased premises is “substantially impaired”  by casualty damage,  the tenant, not the landlord,  has sole discretion to terminate the tenancy and vacate the leased premises.

Here is a Tenant Notice of Termination – Casualty

If the tenant elects to continue the tenancy, I recommend that the tenant issue a seven day notice to perform repairs to the landlord.   This will establish a lawful defense to the non-payment of rent if the landlord files an eviction. In this case,  the tenant will have to file a motion to determine rent, an answer and affirmative defenses in five business days of being served.  The court will then hold an evidentiary hearing on the condition of the premises and determine if the rent should be reduced.   The tenant will then have to pay the rent to the court registry as ordered by the court and as it comes due thereafter.   There are no grace periods once the court has ordered the rent paid to the court registry.

The tenant should try to come to an agreement with the landlord about the abatement or reduction of the rent and the repairs.  Bear in mind that the landlord’s legal duty is to act reasonably.  Not all repairs can be completed in seven days.

Note that service of an eviction can be done by posting,  so an eviction may proceed without a tenant having actual notice of it.  You can check to see if an eviction has been filed with the clerk of court.

Here is the link to the Monroe County Clerk of Court https://gov.kofiletech.us/FL-Monroe/disclaimer.asp

After clicking the disclaimer choose “civil”  and type your name.  If a case comes up, click view detail.  You will then see the case information.  At the bottom is the docket, a history of the events in the case.

Condo Association that did not have a landlord-tenant relationship with the tenant did not have standing to evict tenant because of failure to obtain association’s approval for tenant occupancy

Tags

, , , , , ,

Plaintiff’  Condominium Association filed an eviction complaint because the Defendant never obtained approval from the Plaintiff for tenant occupancy within the association.

The condominium association did not have a landlord tenant relationship with the Defendant who is the tenant of an unnamed landlord/owner

The court ruled that since a landlord tenant relationship did  not exist between the parties, Plaintiff  lacked standing to sue for eviction action pursuant to Chapter 83.  Notwithstanding, the fact that an association can seek rent from a tenant of an owner where the owner fails to pay maintenance under  §718.116(11)(a), Florida Statutes , in which case a tenant failing to pay rent to the association can then be evicted.

PALM LAKE COOPERATIVE INC. vs.  WILSON, . Palm Beach County.  25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 194a

7 ways to prevent cyber fraud

Tags

, , , ,

Reprinted from Attorneys Title Fund Services LLC June 29, 2017

The FBI recently issued a PSA on this topic and emphasized the following prevention strategies:

  1. Stay Informed – If you have an increased awareness and understanding of how the scams present themselves, you are more likely to recognize when you have been targeted. So STAY INFORMED. Read the PSA issued by the FBI and other resources that are made available to you on this topic.
  2. Internal Prevention – Strong internal prevention techniques, especially with front-line employees, have been very successful in deflecting attempts to infiltrate your closing and divert monies.
  3. Use Secured Email Service– Avoid free web-based email addresses. Establish a company domain name and use it.
  4. Register Similar Domains – Register company domain names that are very similar to yours to prevent a criminal from doing so. This is a new one to me and sounds like a really good idea!
  5. Use a Landline– Consider being old fashioned and use a landline telephone to communicate with realtors, buyers and sellers.
  6. Use the Forward Button – Instead of responding to an email by using the “Reply” button, use the “Forward” button, which will require you to type in the correct email address for the recipient. This may avoid an accidental reply to a fraudster using a similar (but false) email address.
  7. Verify Funds Transfers – Confirm, confirm and re-confirm requests for funds transfers. Carefully scrutinize all e-mail requests for funds transfers. Use phone verification but make sure you use previously known numbers and not numbers provided in an email request.

Estoppel Bill enacted effective July 1, 2017

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Attorneys’ Title Fund Services, LLC.  reports that

“on June 14, 2017, the Governor signed Senate Bill (“SB”) 398, which we all affectionately call the “Estoppel bill.” Effective July 1, 2017, the new law makes substantial changes to all three of Florida’s primary community association statutes – chapter 718, F.S. (condominiums); chapter 719, F.S. (cooperatives); and chapter 720, F.S. (homeowners’ associations).

The new law provides mandatory detailed content for association estoppel certificates and provides that the certificate shall be issued by the association within 10 business days after receipt of the written or electronic request for it. We are working on a sample form to distribute to you which tracks the language of the new statute. The certificate is valid for 30 days if provided via hand delivery or by electronic means – 35 days if provided by regular mail.

Of particular import, the association may not collect sums beyond the amounts specified in the estoppel certificate from anyone who relies on the certificate in good faith.

Associations may charge up to $250.00 for an estoppel certificate if no delinquent amounts are owed. If delinquent amounts are owed to the association, up to $150.00 extra may be charged. When certificates are requested to be provided within 3 business days, a $100.00 additional fee is also allowed. No fee may be charged by the association if the estoppel certificate is delivered to the person who requested it more than 10 business days after receipt of the request.”

Sweeping new Condo bill passed – misconduct criminalized

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Florida Senate unanimously approved a bill that would impose sweeping changes to condominium violations.   The bill is now headed to Governor, and would become law on July 1.

CS/CS/HB 1237  imposes criminal punishments on violations that include forgery of a ballot, theft of association funds,  or the destruction of or the refusal to allow inspection of an official record.

Below are the additions to the existing condominium statute:

SELF DEALING:  Except for a timeshare condominium, a board member, manager, or  management company may not purchase a unit at a foreclosure sale  resulting from the association’s foreclosure of its lien for  unpaid assessments or take title by deed in lieu of foreclosure.

ATTORNEY: An association may not hire an attorney who represents  the management company of the association.

DEBIT CARDS.— (a) An association and its officers, directors, employees, and agents may not use a debit card issued in the name of the association, or billed directly to the association, for the payment of any association expense. (b) Use of a debit card issued in the name of the association, or billed directly to the association, for any  expense that is not a lawful obligation of the association may be prosecuted as credit card fraud pursuant to s. 817.61. 572 Section 2. To implement the website requirement in section 1 of this act, the Department of Business and Professional  Regulation is directed to include within the next condominium association annual fee statement required by s. 718.501(2)(a),  Florida Statutes, a notice informing condominium associations of 150 or more units of the requirement to create a website for association documents that is operational on or before July 1, 2018. 580 Section 3.

SERVICE PROVIDERS; CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.—An  association, which is not a timeshare condominium association, may not employ or contract with any service provider that is  owned or operated by a board member or with any person who has a financial relationship with a board member or officer, or a  relative within the third degree of consanguinity by blood or marriage of a board member or officer. This paragraph does not  apply to a service provider in which a board member or officer, or a relative within the third degree of consanguinity by blood  or marriage of a board member or officer, owns less than 1 percent of the equity shares.

A party contracting to provide maintenance or  management services to an association managing a residential  condominium after transfer of control of the association, as provided in s. 718.301, which is not a timeshare condominium association, or an officer or board member of such party, may not purchase a unit at a foreclosure sale resulting from the  association’s foreclosure of association lien for unpaid  assessments or take a deed in lieu of foreclosure. If 50 percent  or more of the units in the condominium are owned by a party  contracting to provide maintenance or management services to an association managing a residential condominium after transfer of  control of the association, as provided in s. 718.301, which is  not a timeshare condominium association, or by an officer or board member of such party, the contract with the party providing maintenance or management services may be cancelled by a majority vote of the unit owners other than the contracting party or an officer or board member of such party.  Section 6. Section 718.3027, Florida Statutes, is created  to read:  718.3027 Conflicts of interest.— (1) Directors and officers of a board of an association that is not a timeshare condominium association, and the relatives of such directors and officers, must disclose to the board any activity that may reasonably be construed to be a conflict of interest. A rebuttable presumption of a conflict of  interest exists if any of the following occurs without prior notice, as required in subsection (4): (a) A director or an officer, or a relative of a director or an officer, enters into a contract for goods or services with the association. (b) A director or an officer, or a relative of a director  or an officer, holds an interest in a corporation, limited liability corporation, partnership, limited liability partnership, or other business entity that conducts business  with the association or proposes to enter into a contract or other transaction with the association. (2) If a director or an officer, or a relative of a director or an officer, proposes to engage in an activity that  is a conflict of interest, as described in subsection (1), the proposed activity must be listed on, and all contracts and transactional documents related to the proposed activity must be attached to, the meeting agenda. If the board votes against the proposed activity, the director or officer, or the relative of the director or officer, must notify the board in writing of his or her intention not to pursue the proposed activity or to  withdraw from office. If the board finds that an officer or a director has violated this subsection, the officer or director shall be deemed removed from office. The vacancy shall be filled according to general law. (3) A director or an officer, or a relative of a director or an officer, who is a party to, or has an interest in, an activity that is a possible conflict of interest, as described in subsection (1), may attend the meeting at which the activity is considered by the board and is authorized to make a presentation to the board regarding the activity. After the presentation, the director or officer, or the relative of the director or officer, must leave the meeting during the discussion of, and the vote on, the activity. A director or an  officer who is a party to, or has an interest in, the activity must recuse himself or herself from the vote. (4) A contract entered into between a director or an officer, or a relative of a director or an officer, and the association, which is not a timeshare condominium association, that has not been properly disclosed as a conflict of interest or potential conflict of interest as required by s. 718.111(12)(g) is voidable and terminates upon the filing of a  written notice terminating the contract with the board of directors which contains the consent of at least 20 percent of the voting interests of the association.  (5) As used in this section, the term “relative” means a relative within the third degree of consanguinity by blood or marriage.

RECEIVER:   A receiver may not exercise voting rights of any unit  owner whose unit is placed in receivership for the benefit of  the association pursuant to this chapter

TERM LIMITS:  A board  member may not serve more than four consecutive 2-year terms, unless approved by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the total voting interests of the association or unless there are not enough eligible candidates to fill the vacancies on the board at the time of the vacancy

FINANCIAL REPORTING:  An association shall provide  an annual report to the department containing the names of all of the financial institutions with which it maintains accounts,  and a copy of such report may be obtained from the department 1253 upon written request of any association member.

ASSOCIATION WEBSITE:  By July 1, 2018, an association with 150 or more  units which does not manage timeshare units shall post digital copies of the documents specified in subparagraph 2. on its  website.  The association’s website must be:  (I) An independent website or web portal wholly owned and  operated by the association; or  (II) A website or web portal operated by a third-party  provider with whom the association owns, leases, rents,  otherwise obtains the right to operate a web page,  or collection of subpages or web portals dedicated to  the association’s activities and on which required notices,  records, and documents may be posted by the association.  b. The association’s website must be accessible through  the Internet and must contain a subpage, web portal, or other protected electronic location that is inaccessible to the  general public and accessible only to unit owners and employees  of the association.  c. Upon a unit owner’s written request, the association  must provide the unit owner with a username and password and  access to the protected sections of the association’s website  that contain any notices, records, or documents that must be  electronically provided. . A current copy of the following documents must be 391 posted in digital format on the association’s website:  a. The recorded declaration of condominium of each  condominium operated by the association and each amendment to  each declaration.  b. The recorded bylaws of the association and each  amendment to the bylaws.  c. The articles of incorporation of the association, or  other documents creating the association, and each amendment  thereto. The copy posted pursuant to this sub-subparagraph must  be a copy of the articles of incorporation filed with Department of State.  d. The rules of the association.  e. Any management agreement, lease, or other contract to  which the association is a party or under which the association  or the unit owners have an obligation or responsibility.  Summaries of bids for materials, equipment, or services must be  maintained on the website for 1 year.  f. The annual budget required by s. 718.112(2)(f) and any  proposed budget to be considered at the annual meeting.  g. The financial report required by subsection (13) and 411 any proposed financial report to be considered at a meeting.  h. The certification of each director required by s.  718.112(2)(d)4.b.  i. All contracts or transactions between the association  and any director, officer, corporation, firm, or association  that is not an affiliated condominium association or any other  entity in which an association director is also a director or  officer and financially interested.  j. Any contract or document regarding a conflict of  interest or possible conflict of interest as provided in ss.  468.436(2) and 718.3026(3).  k. The notice of any unit owner meeting and the agenda for  the meeting, as required by s. 718.112(2)(d)3., no later than 14  days before the meeting. The notice must be posted in plain view  on the front page of the website, or on a separate subpage of the website labeled “Notices” which is conspicuously visible and  linked from the front page. The association must also post on  its website any document to be considered and voted on by the  owners during the meeting or any document listed on the agenda  at least 7 days before the meeting at which the document or the  information within the document will be considered.  l. Notice of any board meeting, the agenda, and any other  document required for the meeting as required by s. 718.112(2)(c), which must be posted no later than the date  required for notice pursuant to s. 718.112(2)(c).  2. The association shall ensure that the information and  records described in paragraph (c), which are not permitted to  be accessible to unit owners, are not posted on the  association’s website. If protected information or information restricted from being accessible to unit owners is included in  documents that are required to be posted on the association’s  website, the association shall ensure the information is redacted before posting the documents online.

FAILURE TO DELIVER REPORT:   A unit owner may provide written notice to the division of the association’s failure to mail or hand deliver  him or her a copy of the most recent financial report within 5 business days after he or she submitted a written request to the association for a copy of such report. If the determines that the association failed to mail or hand deliver a  copy of the most recent financial report to the unit owner, the division shall provide written notice to the association that the association must mail or hand deliver a copy of the most recent financial report to the unit owner and the division within 5 business days after it receives such notice from the division. An association that fails to comply with the division’s request may not waive the financial reporting requirement provided in paragraph (d). A financial report received by the division pursuant to this paragraph shall be maintained, and the division shall provide a copy of such report  to an association member upon his or her request.

A renter of a unit has  a right to inspect and copy the association’s bylaws and rules.

Ober reversed on appeal

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

Liens recorded after the judgment of foreclosure and before the sale are foreclosed if the lienor does not intervene in the action within 30 days” after the recording of the notice of lis pendens.

On November 26, 2007 a bank  recorded a lis pendens on certain property as part of a foreclosure lawsuit against a homeowner. On September 22, 2008, the bank obtained a final judgment of foreclosure. On September 27, 2012, the foreclosure sale was conducted with the Bank as the successful bidder. It later sold the property to Ober.

From July 13, 2009 through October 27, 2011, Town of Lauderdale-by-the-Sea, recorded seven liens on the subject property related to various code violations occurring after the entry of the final judgment.

Ober filed suit to quiet title, attempting to strike the liens against his property. The Town’s counterclaim sought to foreclose the liens. The trial court granted the Town’s motion, denied Ober’s motion, and entered a final judgment of foreclosure on the seven liens recorded prior to the judicial sale, as well as on three liens imposed after the sale of the property. Ober does not argue that those three post-judicial sale liens were discharged, and on remand the trial court may enter judgment on them.

The 4th Discrict Court of Appeals reversed holding:  [T]he recording of a notice of lis pendens ․ constitutes a bar to the enforcement against the property described in the notice of all interests and liens  unrecorded at the time of recording the notice unless the holder of any such unrecorded interest or lien intervenes in such proceedings within 30 days after the recording of the notice. If the holder of any such unrecorded interest or lien does not intervene in the proceedings and if such proceedings are prosecuted to a judicial sale of the property described in the notice, the property shall be forever discharged from all such unrecorded interests and liens.

A proper reading of section 48.23(1)(d) is, as the Florida Land Title Association suggests, that “when a foreclosure action is prosecuted to a judicial sale, that sale discharges all liens, whether recorded before the final judgment or after, if the lienor does not intervene in the action within 30 days” after the recording of the notice of lis pendens.

James Ober, appellant v Town of Lauderdale by the Sea, appellee, 4th DCA, No. 4D14-4597, 1/25/2017