• About
  • Complaints
  • Contact us
  • Forms
  • Disclaimer
  • Copyright

Florida Landlord-Tenant Law

~ a digest of Florida Landlord Tenant Court Decisions

Florida Landlord-Tenant Law

Monthly Archives: May 2013

Court awards Contingency fee multiplier of 2 x $300/hour to prevailing tenant’s attorney.

23 Thursday May 2013

Posted by apjlaw in Landlord - Tenant

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

attorneys fees, Contingency fee multiplier, expert witness fees, florida, LANDLORD, loadstar, TENANT

Landlord filed an eviction.  Tenant’s attorney filed a motion to dismiss.  Landlord filed a voluntary dismissal.  The court ruled that upon a voluntary dismissal  by landlord,  tenant is the prevailing party and thus entitled to recover reasonable attorneys fees and costs.

At the hearing on fees on costs  the court determined that the tenant’s attorney had taken on the case strictly on contingency fee, and that with a 50% probability of success was entitled to a fee multiplier of two.   The court noted that there are only a few attorneys who represent tenants, and that the only way to entice more attorneys to represent tenants is to award contingent fee multipliers, and that the tenant could not otherwise afford to hire an attorney.

The expert testified that:

a. that the relevant market (Orange, Seminole, and Osceola Counties) requires a contingency fee multiplier to ensure that tenants be able to obtain competent counsel.

b. that based on the nature of tenant defense work the defense attorney is rarely able to mitigate the risk of non-payment and the attorney was unable to do so in this case; and

c. That other factors set forth in Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 1985) are applicable, especially, “the amount involved (in this case possession of the property), the result obtained (a dismissal), and the fee arrangement with the client (pure contingency).

Three hundred dollars per hour was deemed a reasonable hourly fee, and 5.8  hours were found to have been expended.  Further Tenant’s witness on attorneys fees charged $375/hour for two hours.    Total  fee awarded to tenant $4230.00.

BANEZ, vs. BANEZ, County Court, 9th Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County. Case No. 2012-CC-015710-O. February 13, 2013. Adam McGinnis, Judge.  20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 513a.

Rate this:

Tax Deed upheld despite the fact that notice to mortgagee’s record address was returned as undeliverable.

14 Tuesday May 2013

Posted by apjlaw in Tax Deeds

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

197.502(4), 197.522(1), mortgagee, notice, tax deed, undeliverable

Mortgagee sued to overturn a tax deed sale extinguishing its two mortgage liens on the subject property on the basis that the notice sent to it was returned as undeliverable. 

undeliverable_address Florida Statutes  §197.522(1),  provide that prior to a tax deed sale the Clerk of Court  is to issue notice of the application for a tax deed to interested parties as identified in §197.502(4). “Interested parties”  include  any mortgagee of record if the address appears on the recorded mortgage. The Clerk sent notice of the Tax deed sale to the mortgagee  at the address listed on both mortgages recorded against the subject property. The notice was returned as undeliverable.  The mortgagee admitted that it had moved its primary address and did not directly notify the Tax Collector’s office of the new address. The Clerk’s office admits that after the notice was returned it took no further action to attempt to locate a new address for Beneficial.

Continue reading →

Rate this:

Eviction of a boat

08 Wednesday May 2013

Posted by apjlaw in 7 Day Notice / Lease violations, Landlord - Tenant

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

83.52, 83.56, admiralty, boat, boat slip, florida, LANDLORD, live aboard, marina, TENANT

houseboat-hillbillyMarina owner’s action for residential eviction against defendant who rented slip at marina, and occupied boat that remained stationary, and was used exclusively as a residence, defendant’s contention that action fell within federal admiralty jurisdiction was without merit

Factual Background

Plaintiff is the owner of a marina. Plaintiff rents a slip to Defendant, who owns and resides on the boat docked in the marina. Plaintiff filed this action for residential eviction based on a FIVE  day notice to cure   under  Fla. Stat. §83.52, failure to maintain dwelling unit.  The tenant argued that Admiralty Law controlled and the court had no jurisdiction,  and that Plaintiff’s five day notice to cure was defective.

Continue reading →

Rate this:

About this Blog

This blog contains articles about Florida landlord-tenant law written by a practicing Florida lawyer.

There are free landlord-tenant forms on the Forms Tab above, and even more free forms on my website FloridaREI.com (click on the link below).

You can search the articles by terms in the search tab above, or click on the categories below to browse.

Comments and feedback are welcome and I will try to answer your questions (within reason).

Click "subscribe" below to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Click on the Monkey below to subscribe to our real estate investors newsletter

The Florida Bar urges you to read the disclaimer above.

Click here for more forms

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Categories

  • Foreclosure
  • Landlord – Tenant
    • 15 Day Notice / Termination of Tenancy
    • 3 Day Notice / Non-payment of rent
    • 7 Day Notice / Lease violations
    • Commercial
    • Damages
    • Foreclosure
    • Lease Terms
    • Legal requirements
    • Notice Requirements
    • Repair issues
    • Requirement to post rent into court registry
    • Security Deposit
  • Real Estate
  • Scams
  • Tax Deeds
  • Uncategorized

Pages

  • About
  • Contact us
  • Forms
  • Disclaimer
  • Complaints
  • Copyright

Archives

  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011

Blog at WordPress.com.

Cancel
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy