• About
  • Complaints
  • Contact us
  • Forms
  • Disclaimer
  • Copyright

Florida Landlord-Tenant Law

~ a digest of Florida Landlord Tenant Court Decisions

Florida Landlord-Tenant Law

Monthly Archives: March 2012

News from the short sale front: more problems from Bank of America

30 Friday Mar 2012

Posted by apjlaw in Foreclosure

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

approval, authorization, Bank of America, boa, foreclosure, hafa, mortgage, negotiator, sale, servicer, short, short sale

News from Title Express:  BOA assigning loans to new servicers – short sale files closed out.    Mortgage brokers no longer authorized to communicate with BOA  on short sales starting April 14, 2012

Continue reading →

Advertisements

Rate this:

Tort Liability

28 Wednesday Mar 2012

Posted by apjlaw in Damages, Landlord - Tenant, Legal requirements, Repair issues

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Casualty, damages, florida, injury, LANDLORD, liability, notice, personal, repair, TENANT, tort

Black’s law dictionary defines a “tort” as denoting a wrong or wrongful act, for which an action will lie. When can a landlord’s failure to perform repairs become a tort ?

 In  the case of  FISHER  vs.  PEARSON,  [ Circuit Court, 17th Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County. Case No. 06-003536 CACE (04). October 27, 2008,  16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 426a],  the tenant moved into an apartment September 1, 2003.   There were no apparent defects. On the morning of February 5, 2004, the tenant noticed a leak in the living room ceiling.  The tenant notified the  landlord  of the leak.   Within a few minutes of notifying the  landlord  of the leak the ceiling collapsed onto the tenant.   The tenant sued the  landlord  for the injuries.  The court granted summary judgment in favor of the landlord as the landlord had not been notified of the condition in time to remedy it.

Continue reading →

Rate this:

Notice of lease violation

22 Thursday Mar 2012

Posted by apjlaw in 7 Day Notice / Lease violations, Landlord - Tenant, Legal requirements

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

83.56(2)(b), arrest, conviction, crime, cure, florida, incurable, LANDLORD, lease, notice, seven day, TENANT, unauthorized occupant, violation

The landlord’s seven-day notice of lease violation alleging unauthorized boarders was held  defective for failing to provide the tenant with an opportunity to cure and also  for alleging that the unauthorized boarder was arrested without indicating that boarder was engaged in criminal activity — Mere arrest is not tantamount to criminal activity or violation of lease.

1. Defendantl Warren, (hereinafter “Ms. Warren”) occupies residential real property owned by Plaintiff, Miami-Dade County, under a public housing lease.

2. Plaintiff filed a complaint for eviction against Ms. Warren on November 11, 2010, based upon a 7-Day Notice of Termination.

3. Plaintiff’s 7-Day Notice of Termination states in pertinent part: “Ms. Warren you have two unauthorized boarders living in your unit who are not listed on your public housing lease. One was arrested at your unit on 10/22/2010 for Violation of Probation due to Possession of a loaded gun which was in plain sight on the nightstand (No Permit for Gun). The arrestee gave the arresting officer Ms. Warren’s address as her place of residence.”

4. Proper statutory notices must be provided for each violation alleged by Plaintiff in the complaint.

5. Plaintiff’s 7-Day Notice of Termination is defective as it failed to provide Ms. Warren with an opportunity to cure regarding the allegation of unauthorized persons.

6. In accordance with Section 83.56(2)(b), Florida Statutes,  an unauthorized person residing in a public housing unit is the type of non-compliance for which a tenant should be given an opportunity to cure.

7. Plaintiff’s 7-Day Notice of Termination is also defective as it alleges that the unauthorized person was arrested with a crime and does not indicate that the person has engaged in criminal activity.

8. Plaintiff cannot evict a public housing tenant for criminal activity when the only allegation is that the person has been arrested. Merely being arrested is not criminal activity and is not a violation of the lease.

9.  As the notice of termination was defective, Plaintiff’s complaint for eviction is dismissed.

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, v. WARREN, . County Court, 11th Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Civil Division. Case No. 10-18626 CC 05. June 16, 2011. Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1905WARR

Rate this:

If it looks like a duck ….

13 Tuesday Mar 2012

Posted by apjlaw in Foreclosure, Landlord - Tenant, Lease Terms, Legal requirements

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

contract for deed, eviction, florida, foreclosure, LANDLORD, lease, lease option, mortgage, TENANT

The “duck test”  is defined as  “If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.”

The court found that a written “Real Estate Lease”  which required tenant to make regular monthly payments to landlord; to reimburse landlord  for one-twelfth of his annual insurance premiums, property taxes, and mobile home registration expenses; and to maintain and repair subject dwelling unit and real property; and which further gave tenant  option to purchase at end of twelve-year term for specified sum constituted a contract for deed, rather than a lease.  A contract for deed is excluded from eviction procedures provided under Landlord-Tenant Act.    Eviction complaint dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Possession of  real property under a contract for deed  is tantamount to a mortgage and subject to the same rules of foreclosure and the same regulations and restraints as mortgages generally. Ziegler v. Hawkins, 315 So2d 200 (Fla 1st DCA 1975); H & L Land Co. v. Warner, 258 So2d 293 (Fla 2nd DCA 1972; and Cook v. Merryfield, 335 So2d 297 (Fla 1st DCA 1976).   Therefore “Landlord’s”   complaint to evict “Tenant”  is dismissed.

BUYER’S ADVANTAGE FINANCE CO., INC.,   v. MORSE,. County Court, in and for Santa Rosa County, December 3, 1996.  4 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 475c.

Rate this:

Foreclosure dismissed where verification of complaint was signed by a person who was not identified as related to plaintiff

13 Tuesday Mar 2012

Posted by apjlaw in Foreclosure

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

complaint, florida, foreclosure, Mortgages, Verification

Effective February 11, 2010, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.110(b) requires plaintiff seeking to foreclose a residential mortgage to verify the complaint. In addition, any verification of a foreclosure complaint must be in conformity with Section 92.525, Florida Statutes (2011), as construed by Muss v. Lennar Florida Partners, 673 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) [21 Fla. L. Weekly D849b]. The Supreme Court indicates in its opinion that one of the primary purposes of the rule change is to have the plaintiff appropriately investigate and verify its allegations. In re Amendments to The Florida Rules Civil Procedure, 44 So. 3d 555 (Fla. 2010) [35 Fla. L. Weekly S317a].

The purported verification in this action was signed by a“Debra Blaney,” who was not represented or identified in any way to be connected or related to the Plaintiff. There is no statement or allegation in the complaint or the verification indicating that Ms. Blaney has knowledge of the matters alleged in the complaint or is authorized to verify the complaint on the Plaintiff’s behalf.  Consequently,  the court finds that the complaint filed by Plaintiff in the instant action is not verified in accordance with Rule 1.110(b).   The court continued Defendant’s Motion for Fraud on the Court for an evidentiary hearing, but granted Defendants Motion to Dismiss the foreclosure complaint with leave to amend within 60 days

US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, As TRUSTEE FOR THE STRUCTURED ASSEST SECURITIES CORPORATION MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES, 2006, BC 4, Plaintiff, vs. STOKES.  Circuit Court, 4th Judicial Circuit in and for Duval County. Case No. 16-2011-CA-2233-XXXX, Division FC-F. February 8, 2012. Online Reference: FLWSUPP 1905STOK


Rate this:

Foreclosure judgment vacated where plaintiff was assigned mortgage & note after complaint filed

13 Tuesday Mar 2012

Posted by apjlaw in Foreclosure

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

assignment, florida, foreclosure, Mortgages, standing

Where record shows that plaintiff did not obtain standing through assignment of note and mortgage until after foreclosure complaint was filed, motion to vacate final judgment of foreclosure is granted

Continue reading →

Rate this:

My tenant is dead. Now what do I do ?

07 Wednesday Mar 2012

Posted by apjlaw in Landlord - Tenant, Legal requirements, Notice Requirements

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

83.59(d), dead, death, deceased, florida, florida landlord tenant dead 83.59(d), LANDLORD, probate, TENANT

 Florida Statues §83.59(d) provides that if the only tenant has died, the rent is unpaid, and sixty days  has elapsed and the landlord has not received a notice of probate, the  landlord automatically recovers possession.   Abandoned property shall be dealt with as per the lease terms or statute.  The law does allow you to execute an abandoned property agreement which would allow you to automatically dispose of the tenant’s belongings.  This must be executed as an addendum to the lease.

Rate this:

NOTE HOLDER HAS STANDING TO FORECLOSE

01 Thursday Mar 2012

Posted by apjlaw in Foreclosure

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

assignment, florida, foreclosue, mortgage, note, promissory, standing

Appellate court rules that Bank that was in actual possession of the promissory note had standing to foreclose even though there was no valid assignment of mortgage
Continue reading →

Rate this:

Title insurers reject mortgage terminator judgments

01 Thursday Mar 2012

Posted by apjlaw in Foreclosure

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

florida, foreclosure, judgment, law suit, mortgage, terminator, title insurance

Old Republic Title Insurance issued the following directive to its title insurance agents:

“A Fund Member should not close and insure any transaction where the title search  and examination depends upon the outcome of a lawsuit seeking to extinguish an outstanding mortgage without obtaining approval from The

Fund’s Legal Underwriting Department.”

“There remains a significant body of precedent that suggest that these terminator judgments would not operate as res judicata or law of the case in a subsequent proceeding filed by the mortgagee to enforce the mortgage.”

 

Fund Concept March 2012 

Rate this:

About this Blog

This blog contains articles about Florida landlord-tenant law written by a practicing Florida lawyer.

There are free landlord-tenant forms on the Forms Tab above, and even more free forms on my website FloridaREI.com (click on the link below).

You can search the articles by terms in the search tab above, or click on the categories below to browse.

Comments and feedback are welcome and I will try to answer your questions (within reason).

Click "subscribe" below to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Click on the Monkey below to subscribe to our real estate investors newsletter

The Florida Bar urges you to read the disclaimer above.

Click here for more forms

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Categories

  • Foreclosure
  • Landlord – Tenant
    • 15 Day Notice / Termination of Tenancy
    • 3 Day Notice / Non-payment of rent
    • 7 Day Notice / Lease violations
    • Commercial
    • Damages
    • Foreclosure
    • Lease Terms
    • Legal requirements
    • Notice Requirements
    • Repair issues
    • Requirement to post rent into court registry
    • Security Deposit
  • Real Estate
  • Scams
  • Tax Deeds
  • Uncategorized

Pages

  • About
  • Contact us
  • Forms
  • Disclaimer
  • Complaints
  • Copyright

Archives

  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
Advertisements

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Cancel
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy