• About
  • Complaints
  • Contact us
  • Forms
  • Disclaimer
  • Copyright

Florida Landlord-Tenant Law

~ a digest of Florida Landlord Tenant Court Decisions

Florida Landlord-Tenant Law

Monthly Archives: May 2014

Borrower bankruptcy filed after the expiration of the redemption period acts neither to stay the issuance of the certificate of title, nor writ of possession.

29 Thursday May 2014

Posted by apjlaw in Foreclosure

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

bankruptcy, certificate of sale, foreclosure, post redemption period, stay, writ of possession

bankruptcyIn a residential foreclosure, a third party purchased the property at auction. On July 11, 2013, the Clerk of Court issued a Certificate of Sale.  On September 26, 2013 Defendants filed bankruptcy.  On October 8, 2013, the clerk issued a  Certificate of Title. On January 6, 2014, the  Court,  issued a writ of possession.  Thereafter, Defendants filed to reverse the sale and stay the writ.

The court noted that the redemption period set forth in § 45.0315, Fla. Stat., is “the later of the filing of a certificate of sale . . . or the time specified in judgment, order, or decree of foreclosure . . . .” See, e.g., Matter of Sarasota Land Co v. Barnett Bank of Sarasota, NA., 36 B.R. 563, 566 (M.D. Fla. 1983) (holding that because the debtor/mortgagor failed to exercise his right of redemption within the statutory period, his interest in the property was permanently foreclosed and the issuance of the Certificate of Title was proper); In re Trust No. 101B, 77 B.R. 973, 975 (S.D. Fla. 1987) (reaching the same conclusion as Sarasota Land and holding that the purchaser at the judicial sale “is now entitled to receive a Certificate of Title pursuant to Florida law without the need for further proceedings.”).  In this case, the foreclosure judgment is silent on the issue and the Certificate of Sale was filed months prior to the bankruptcy filing.   Therefore,  as defendants redemption period had expired,  they had no remaining interest in the property, and the bankruptcy could act neither to reverse the sale or stay the writ of possession.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A,  v  OSBORNE, et al.,. Circuit Court, 11th Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County. Case No. 2011-3143 CA 01 (11). February 24, 2014. 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 519b

Rate this:

Rent due on illegal dwelling unit

14 Wednesday May 2014

Posted by apjlaw in Damages, Landlord - Tenant

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

damages, granny flat, illegal dwelling unit, in-law apartment, LANDLORD, TENANT, zoning violation

Landlord rented Tenant an “in-law” studio apartment attached to a single family home.  After several disagreements regarding the apartment,  tenant called the Code Enforcement Board (“CEB”) to complain about the condition of the apartment. grannyflat

While the CEB officer found that the apartment was clean, he also found that the apartment was in violation of applicable zoning laws prohibiting two dwelling units on the property.  Landlord terminated the tenancy effective  June 30th,  but the tenant held over.  Landlord issued a 3 day notice on July 9th,  and then filed an eviction for non-payment of rent.  On August 4th, tenant  vacated the premises. On August 11, 1997, the trial court entered final judgment in favor of  landlord and  damages in the amount of $1,000.00 for July and August rent due at $500.00  per month.

Tenant appealed.   The appellate court ruled that to permit the landlord to receive a full month’s rent  for August  when she would not otherwise be able to rent the apartment would create a windfall for her. However,  the landlord is entitled to be compensated for tenant’s  use and occupancy of the premises through August 4th. See generally Morris Investment Partnership v. Figueroa, 698 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).  Therefore the appellate court awarded July rent and prorated rent for August.

Author’s Note: by issuing a 3 day notice after the date of lease termination,  landlord reinstated the month to month tenancy and forfeited the remedy of double rent per diem for the holdover.

MORRIS, v. WAGNER,  9th Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County. Case No. CVA197-59. April 22, 1999.  6 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 451b.

Rate this:

Advanced rent not refundable on lease termination

07 Wednesday May 2014

Posted by apjlaw in 7 Day Notice / Lease violations, Landlord - Tenant, Security Deposit

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

advance rent, Depierro, LANDLORD, TENANT, termination of tenancy, unjust enrichment

Landlord and tenant entered into a lease for residential real property on the following terms:  First months rent $5500,  Advance rent for 11 months $60,500, Security Deposit $5,500, Pet Deposit $500.  All payable at lease inception.

wild partyFour months into the lease,  landlord received complaints from neighbors about a wild party and inspecting the property found significant damage to the rental unit.  Landlord issued a notice of lease termination and tenants vacated.  The landlord did not return any monies to the tenant and the tenant sued for their security deposit and  for the return of “advance rent”  paid to landlord.   The trial court found that the $38,500 of the rent paid for the balance of the lease term was “advance rent”  and refundable, and that as the landlord had not made a written claim on the security deposit,  that too was refundable.  The court awarded landlord a setoff for $3,524.15 in damages to the unit.

On appeal,  the court ruled that there was no “advance rent,”  but rather the parties had entered into an annual  lease with one annual payment.  Section 83.43(9) defines “advance rent” as “moneys paid to the landlord to be applied to future rent payment periods, but does not include rent paid in advance for a current rent payment period.”  The court went on to state that  “even if this were advance rent, the landlord still would have been entitled to retain the unused portion of the money.   In Florida, if a lessee pays rent in advance and the lease is properly terminated by the lessor, then the lessor is not required to return the advance rental payment, citing Wagner v. Rice, 97 So.2d 267 (Fla.1957).

The appellate reversed the refund of the $38,500  advance rent back to the tenant,  but  upheld the return of  the security deposit less damages.

ATLANTIS ESTATE ACQUISITIONS, INC., v. DePIERRO,  125 So.3d 889 (Fla 4th DCA 2013)

Rate this:

About this Blog

This blog contains articles about Florida landlord-tenant law written by a practicing Florida lawyer.

There are free landlord-tenant forms on the Forms Tab above, and even more free forms on my website FloridaREI.com (click on the link below).

You can search the articles by terms in the search tab above, or click on the categories below to browse.

Comments and feedback are welcome and I will try to answer your questions (within reason).

Click "subscribe" below to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Click on the Monkey below to subscribe to our real estate investors newsletter

The Florida Bar urges you to read the disclaimer above.

Click here for more forms

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Categories

  • Foreclosure
  • Landlord – Tenant
    • 15 Day Notice / Termination of Tenancy
    • 3 Day Notice / Non-payment of rent
    • 7 Day Notice / Lease violations
    • Commercial
    • Damages
    • Foreclosure
    • Lease Terms
    • Legal requirements
    • Notice Requirements
    • Repair issues
    • Requirement to post rent into court registry
    • Security Deposit
  • Real Estate
  • Scams
  • Tax Deeds
  • Uncategorized

Pages

  • About
  • Contact us
  • Forms
  • Disclaimer
  • Complaints
  • Copyright

Archives

  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Cancel
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy